Motion in Division

Single channel projection: 8’35”. Silent.

East of the capital Ljubljana, Slovenia stands the Zapornica na Ljubljanici, the Ljubljanica Sluice Gate. Designed by architect Jože Plečnik in 1939, the concrete and stone-clad gate with three towers was designed as a triumphant farewell to the river Ljubljanica as it exits the city as well as a functional device to regulate water levels. Two towers stand on each side of the bank of the Ljubljanica and one in the middle. Three stylised human heads carved into the top of three low Ionic columns watch over the water as it falls off the edge of the gate and moves eastward. At the constructed edge, the water and gate interact, establishing new conditions of the river. Motion in Division itself does not follow the flow of the Ljubljanica from west to east (i.e. starting at the gate and moving down the river) but instead examines the structural forces that influence its movement and direction, and qualities of the water’s resistance.

Motion in Division is inherently focused on the tension between two opposing forces: the solidity and permanence of concrete, and the fluidity and constant change of water. These elements interact throughout the film, each influencing and shaping the other in turn. At times, water is depicted flowing around the concrete, carving out new shapes and contours; at other times, the concrete stands firm against the rushing water, creating eddies and currents that swirl around its surface, an interplay that hints at the deeper philosophical implications of the relationship between concrete and water. On the one hand, we might see concrete as a symbol of human power and control: a material that allows us to shape and manipulate the world according to our own designs. On the other, water represents the uncontrollable forces of water: a fluid, dynamic element that resists our attempts to harness it.

Louis Althusser's theory of the "swerve" offers a compelling framework for understanding the concrete/water dynamic. According to Althusser, history is characterized by sudden and unpredictable shifts, or "swerves," that disrupt the prevailing social and economic order. Swerves are the result of the contradictions and tensions inherent in a given system, and have the potential to open up new possibilities for transformation and change. In Motion in Division, we see a similar dynamic at play: the dominance of concrete over water represents a particular social and economic order, one that values efficiency, control, and predictability. The swerve, however, occurs when we witness the resistance of water, which cannot be fully contained or controlled by the concrete structures built to contain it. Resistance opens up new possibilities for transformation and the potential for alternative modes of interactions with natural systems.

Motion in Division is a reflection on the consequences of human actions, both material and philosophical, and considers both the ways in which our desire for control and predictability may come at the expense of the inherent dynamism of natural systems, and the ever-forging resistance of natural systems to mechanisms of containment. Motion in division is silent, a structural device that echoes the way that concrete dampens, subdues or replaces natural sensory cues and produces limited aesthetic experiences. The selected scene transitions produce a sensation of movement and shift in location that reflects a first-person perspective. The fades to black also affecting the light qualities of the presentation space when the video work is projected.

Previous
Previous

A Force Against

Next
Next

Chairs